KOMPARASI SISTEM PEMBELAJARAN PESANTREN TRADISIONAL DAN MODERN TERHADAP RELEVANSI LULUSAN DI ABAD 21
Main Article Content
Abstract
Pesantren have long played a strategic role in developing Muslim generations with strong religious knowledge, moral character, and social responsibility. Along with the changing demands of contemporary society, the learning systems of pesantren have evolved into two major models: traditional (salafiyah) and modern (khalafiyah). This study aims to analyze the characteristics of the learning systems implemented in both models, compare their respective strengths and limitations, and examine the relevance of their graduates in addressing contemporary challenges. This research employed a qualitative approach using a library research method. Data were collected from books, peer-reviewed journal articles, government regulations, and other relevant academic sources, and were analyzed using content analysis through the stages of data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing. The findings reveal that traditional pesantren are characterized by a curriculum centered on kitab kuning (classical Islamic texts), learning methods such as bandongan, sorogan, and halaqah, and the central role of the kiai in the educational process. This model excels in cultivating profound Islamic scholarship, religious character, and spiritual maturity. In contrast, modern pesantren implement an integrated curriculum combining Islamic and general education, classroom-based and technology-supported learning, the development of twenty-first-century competencies, and the enhancement of foreign language proficiency. Consequently, this model is better equipped to prepare graduates for higher education, technological advancement, and the labor market. The comparative analysis indicates that these two educational models are complementary rather than contradictory. Therefore, an integrated learning model that combines the strengths of traditional Islamic scholarship with modern educational innovation is considered more relevant for producing graduates who possess strong Islamic competencies, noble character, and the adaptability required to meet the challenges of twenty-first-century society.
Article Details
References
Achmad Alvin Khoirul Adim, Muhammad sabilussalam, & Nurul Mubin. (2026). Metode Pembelajaran Kitab Kuning di Pesantren Salaf dan Relevansinya di Era Modern . Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 3(2), 202–206.
Azra, A. (2012). Pendidikan Islam: Tradisi dan Modernisasi Menuju Milenium Baru. Jakarta: Kencana Prenadamedia Group.
Bruinessen, M. van. (2015). Kitab Kuning, Pesantren, dan Tarekat: Tradisi-Tradisi Islam di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Gading Publishing.
Dedi Sugari, Hilalludin Hilalludin, & Erna Dwi Mariyani. (2025). Perbedaan Pesantren Tradisional Dan Pesantren Modern di Indonesia. Ta’limuna: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 1(1), 30–46.
Denny Kodrat. (2013). Sistem Input-Proses-Output-Outcome Pendidikan Bermutu: Fungsional, Produktif, Efektif, Efisien Dan Akuntabel. Purbalingga: Penerbit Nasional Press.
Dhofier, Z. (2011). Tradisi Pesantren: Studi tentang Pandangan Hidup Kiai (Edisi Revisi). Jakarta: LP3ES.
Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Islam. (2020). Pedoman Penyelenggaraan Pesantren. Jakarta: Kementerian Agama Republik Indonesia.
Fadhilah, A., & Supriatna, E. (2022). Modernization of pesantren education in responding to the challenges of the Industrial Revolution 4.0. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 11(2), 145–160.
Kemendikbud. (2017). Panduan Implementasi Keterampilan Abad 21 dalam Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Madjid, N. (1997). Bilik-Bilik Pesantren: Sebuah Potret Perjalanan. Jakarta: Paramadina.
Maktumah, L., & Mighfar, S. (2022). Relevansi Sistem Pendidikan Pesantren Salaf di Era Modernisasi. Edukais : Jurnal Pemikiran Keislaman, 6(2), 39–56. https://doi.org/10.61595/edukais.2022.6.2.39-56
Mardiyah, Najwa Sajida El Yunusi, & Nasruddin. (2026). Kurikulum Kulliyatul Mu’allimin Al-Islamiyah (KMI) Gontor Sebagai Model Inovasi Kurikulum Di Tengah Arus Modernisasi Pendidikan. TA’LIMUNA: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam , 15(1), 23–36.
Mestika zed. (2008). Metode penelitian kepustakaan (cetakan 1). Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
Muhaimin. (2012). Pengembangan Kurikulum Pendidikan Agama Islam. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Mulyasa, E. (2021). Menjadi Guru Penggerak Merdeka Belajar. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Nata, A. (2019). Ilmu Pendidikan Islam. Jakarta: Kencana Prenadamedia Group.
Partnership for 21st Century Learning. (2019). Framework for 21st Century Learning. Washington, DC: Battelle for Kids.
Peraturan Menteri Agama Republik Indonesia Nomor 31 Tahun 2020 tentang Pendidikan Pesantren. Jakarta: Kementerian Agama Republik Indonesia.
Republik Indonesia. (2003). Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. Jakarta: Sekretariat Negara Republik Indonesia.
Republik Indonesia. (2019). Undang-Undang Nomor 18 Tahun 2019 tentang Pesantren. Jakarta: Sekretariat Negara Republik Indonesia.
Sanjaya, W. (2016). Strategi Pembelajaran Berorientasi Standar Proses Pendidikan. Jakarta: Kencana Prenadamedia Group.
Sugiyono. (2023). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif (Edisi ke-4). Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sukmadinata, N. S. (2017). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st Century Skills: Learning for Life in Our Times. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining Our Futures Together: A New Social Contract for Education. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.
Yasmadi. (2005). Modernisasi Pesantren: Kritik Nurcholish Madjid terhadap Pendidikan Islam Tradisional. Jakarta: Ciputat Press.
Zamakhsyari Dhofier. (2011). Tradisi Pesantren: Studi Pandangan Hidup Kiai dan Visinya Mengenai Masa Depan Indonesia. Jakarta: LP3ES.